Security in the War on Terror: Predict, Prevent, Police

The Global War on Terror, which was launched in response to the attacks in America on September 11th, has strengthened approaches to securitisation in its attempt to eliminate terrorism. The figure of the ‘terrorist’ is closely associated with that of the Muslim man who through laws and policies related to counter-terrorism and counter-extremism, such as the Prevent Duty, is constructed as a risk and threat to society.

From the Global North to the Global South, racialised communities, especially those racialised as Muslim, experience the War on Terror in their everyday spaces such as in schools and healthcare settings, as the frontlines of the war constantly expand. As we approach the 20-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, it is clear that anti-terrorism measures are becoming a permanent feature of society, despite being declared during a state of emergency.

Readings

• CAGE. (2016) The ‘Science’ of Pre-Crime: The Secret ‘Radicalisation’ Study Underpinning Prevent’.
• Fernandez, S., Faure Walker, R. and Younis, T. (2018) The ‘Where’ of Prevent. Discover Society.
• Kundnani, A. 2009. Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism. Available at: https://www.kundnani.org/wp-content/uploads/spooked.pdf
• Open Society Justice Initiative (2016) Eroding Trust: The UK’s Prevent Counter-extremism Strategy in Health and Education.
• Medact (2021) Racism, mental health and pre-crime policing: the ethics of Vulnerability Support Hubs.
• Shafi, A. (2021) The 9/11 complex: The political economy of counter-terrorism. TNI.
• Sian, K. (2017) “Born radicals? Prevent, positivism and ‘race-thinking’”. Palgrave Communications.
• TNI (2019)Leaving the War on Terror: A Progressive Alternative to Counter-Terrorism Policy.

Resources

• Ramesh, R. and Halliday, J. (2015) ‘Student accused of being a terrorist for reading book on terrorism’. The Guardian.
• PositiveNegatives Representing Islam on Campus

Questions for Discussion

1. How do pre-emptive security measures increase feelings of insecurity?
2. In what ways has the War on Terror become a permanent feature of everyday life?
3. To what extent has the War on Terror designated certain groups of people as security threats? In what ways can we challenge these assumptions?